There's better gear out there now for the money with deeper sound engines. Sounds great, yes, but the romanticism has to come to an end at some point. I had a band mate in high school who got one for like $250! Fast forward to 15 years later and now it's like five times as expensive. I remember 15 years ago no one seemed to care about them whatsoever.

I think at this point in time, the only reason worth owning a Juno-60 is for investment purposes. Heck, if it weren't for the chorus or someone blatantly mentioning it on the album sleeve, who here can honestly say, 'oh yeah, that guy is obviously using a Juno-60!' In a real mix, I doubt anyone on this planet would know if you were using a 'real' Juno or not.

And that's just A/B comparisons, where someone actually knows they are trying to spot a difference. To my ears, the samples from that first link posted sounded close enough to point where if you put both in a mix and people had to guess which is which, the correct answers would probably be 50/50.

Juno 60 vst arturia